Sign up now!
Don't show this again
Sweepstakes Rules
Download the report!Continue to Site >
or wait 7 secs

Thank you for confirming your subscription!

(And remember, if ever you want to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, just click on the links at the bottom of any email.)

We’re glad you’re enjoying Pig Health Today.
Access is free but you’ll need to register to view more content.
Already registered? Sign In
Tap to download the app


Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report


Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
follow us

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Pig Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Pig Health Today | Sponsored by Zoetis

Featured Video Play Icon

What have we learned about antibiotic-resistant genes in groundwater?

Swine manure is a valuable resource for cropland, but understanding its potential impact on groundwater is an ongoing priority. This includes if and how antimicrobial-resistant organisms move through groundwater following manure application. Among the researchers looking for answers is Michelle Soupir, PhD, associate professor of agricultural and bioengineering at Iowa State University.  

“I’ve worked a lot with fecal-indicator bacteria E. coli and enterococcus — organisms that are important for protecting human health,” Soupir told Pig Health Today. “The next natural step was to look at some of these organisms to see if they’re also resistant to antibiotics, especially in areas influenced by animal manure.”  

This is particularly important across much of the upper Midwest, where tile drainage has lowered the water table and converted the soil to some of the world’s most productive cropland. “As a result, shallow drainage water hits a pipe and is quickly discharged to nearby surface waters,” she added.   

Soupir’s “laboratory” is comprised of 1-acre plots to create controlled environments to study the impact of manure application on the transport of antibiotics and antibiotic-resistant organisms to subsurface drainage waters.  Another bonus is that some of the plots had not received manure for 30 years, thereby providing a baseline measure for naturally occurring antibiotic-resistant organisms.    

“We know that many antibiotics are developed from soil microorganisms naturally,” she noted. “But this helps us see if there’s a bump up with the addition of manure from facilities that use antibiotics.”  

She has primarily studied the macrolide antibiotic tylosin but will investigate tetracycline next. “Before the expanded veterinary feed directive (VFD), we could always detect tylosin in the manure samples,” Soupir reported. “Hopefully that will be different following the VFD roll out and we see a change in antibiotic use.”  

Notably, different antibiotics perform differently in the environment. “Some are quite mobile; they don’t absorb into the soil profile as tightly,” Soupir noted.  “Others are highly hydrophobic so they won’t move offsite into the water system.”  

More research is underway to study the impact of manure applications done in the spring, early fall and late fall. Based on her research thus far, Soupir’s best advice to mitigate antibiotic transfer and possible resistance is to apply manure in the late fall.  

“If there’s not a big rain event, antibiotic-resistant organisms die off through the winter, and the concentrations are reduced,” Soupir added. “Also, the cropping rotation is important. With back-to-back years of corn, we see higher levels of resistant genes in the drainage water compared to when we have a corn/soybean rotation.”

Posted on April 21, 2018

tags: , , ,
  • Virus persistence challenges PRRS management strategies

    Eliminating porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) from pigs might not yet be possible, but monitoring tools could help refine a herd's PRRSV stability.

  • Research continues to dig for POP answers

    Searching for strategies to alter the course of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in sows has been a long, slow climb with progress coming little by little. At the heart of the effort is the Sow Survivability project

  • Comparing PCV2 gilt vaccination protocols and progeny status

    Porcine circovirus type 2 is the principal etiological agent of porcine circovirus associated disease (PCVAD), which can cost producers an estimated $3 to $4 per pig.

  • Minimal evidence of antibiotic resistance in swine

    Data indicate minimal resistant infections in swine, but that will not deter efforts to maximize preventive care and minimize the need for antibiotics.

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Share It
Looking at individual “pieces of the puzzle” means farm owners can evaluate the pros and cons of Mycoplasma elimination programs and come to a practical solution, says veterinarian David A. Baumert.

Click an icon to share this information with your industry contacts.
Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.