Sign up now!
Don't show this again

Thank you for confirming your subscription!

(And remember, if ever you want to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, just click on the links at the bottom of any email.)
Tap to download the app
X
Share
X

REPORTS

Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report

Favorites

Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
CREATE
X
NEXT
PORK POULTRY
follow us


You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Pig Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Pig Health Today | Sponsored by Zoetis

.
Featured Video Play Icon

‘We’ve almost forgotten that boars just perform better’

Larry Rueff, DVM, is a big believer in immunocastration. Ever since the swine veterinarian from Greensburg, IN, stopped physically castrating some of his pigs 4 years ago, and started using a protein compound that works like an immunization to block boar taint, he’s noticed significant improvements in growth and feed efficiency.

He does want to make one thing clear, though.

“Immunocastration is not the reason the performance is so good,” he stresses.

“It solves the pain-mitigation and infection issues around physical castration. But what it’s allowing the pig to do is to just be a boar. And that pig just performs better than if he had been physically castrated.”

‘Let boars be boars’

“Let boars be boars” is a favorite expression of the veterinarian, who has run 13 groups of immunocastrated pigs through his wean-to-finish facility. Compared to barrows with the same genetics, the immunocastrated pigs he rears consistently demonstrate a 14% to 15% improvement in feed conversion — figures he acknowledges sound like “liar’s numbers.” In reality, however, he says they’re normal for boars.

“I think as an industry we’ve almost forgotten that boars just perform better,” he says. “And so when we use this product, we just get performance levels that most people are unaccustomed to.”

Carcasses from immunocastrated pigs tend to be leaner than those of conventional barrows, Rueff notes, but he says he’s had “no complaints” from packers in the 4 years since he started using the castration alternative. Another benefit he has observed in immunocastrated pigs is that they’re much less aggressive than sexually mature boars — a difference that he says visitors to his barn notice immediately.

Slow uptake in US

Despite these benefits, immunocastration has been slow to catch on among US pork producers, even as its use has steadily increased in Europe, South America, Asia and Australia. Rueff attributes this mainly to a lack of understanding as to how the product works among packers and retailers, who are concerned with how consumers may respond.

“They think hormones. They think of something that would make the pork unsafe. These ideas…are confusing in a lot of areas of food today,” Rueff explains.

“All immunocastration does is block the physiologic process that allows [the compounds responsible for boar taint, androstenone and skatole] to be made…just like the immune system reacts when we vaccinate for mycoplasma or circovirus. We’re just using the body’s natural immune system to turn things off.”

 


tags: ,
RELATED NEWS



You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.