fbpx
Sign up now!
Don't show this again
Download the report!Continue to Site >
or wait 7 secs

Thank you for confirming your subscription!

(And remember, if ever you want to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, just click on the links at the bottom of any email.)

We’re glad you’re enjoying Pig Health Today.
Access is free but you’ll need to register to view more content.
Already registered? Sign In
Tap to download the app
X
Share
X

REPORTS

Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report

Favorites

Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
CREATE
X
NEXT
PORK POULTRY
follow us


You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Pig Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Pig Health Today | Sponsored by Zoetis

.

Two-dose Fostera® Gold PCV MH regimen yields performance advantages

Download the PDF

Pigs in a study that received two doses of Fostera® Gold PCV MH, the new Zoetis vaccine for porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (M. hyo), had numerically fewer reactions, less morbidity, less mortality and a $4.12 per pig advantage at marketing compared to a competitor’s vaccine.1

In a separate trial comparing one dose of the same two vaccines, Fostera Gold PCV MH  performed as well as the competitor’s.2

Fostera Gold PCV MH is the only vaccine for PCV2 in the US to contain two genotypes — PCV2a and PCV2b — and in a challenge study, it protected against 2d,3 the leading PCV2 genotype in the US.4

Southeast field trial

The two-dose field trial was conducted on a farm in the Southeast, said Gene Nemechek, DVM, technical services, Zoetis. The overall health of the herd was good but PCV2d and M. hyo were in the environment, providing a natural challenge.

Gene Nemechek, DVM

One group of 618 pigs received 1 ml of Fostera Gold PCV MH at 3 and 6 weeks of age.  Another 623 pigs received the same protocol with Circumvent® PCV-M G2.

Throughout the trial, oral-fluid and serology samples were tested for PCV and M. hyo by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), he said.

Before the trial, oral-fluid sampling indicated no pigs were positive for PCV2. By mid-finisher stage, seven of nine oral-fluid samples were PCV2-positive, but random serum sampling of individual pigs turned up zero of 16 as positive. Not surprisingly, sequencing of positive samples revealed the PCV2d strain. There were no positive M. hyo results based on oral-fluid sampling throughout the trial, Nemechek said.

In the Fostera Gold PCV MH group, there were numerically fewer vaccine reactions, less morbidity and less mortality, and there were fewer culls at closeout — 0.49% in the Fostera Gold PCV MH group compared to 0.96% in the other group. In addition, 93.53% — 2.84% more — of pigs in the Fostera Gold PCV MH group went to the primary hog market compared to 90.69% in the Circumvent PCV-M G2 group, he said.

Growth and average daily gain were similar in both groups. However, net revenue provided by the producer demonstrated a $4.12-per-pig advantage for those in the Fostera Gold PCV MH group (Table 1), Nemechek reported.

Click table to enlarge

Noel Garbes, DVM

One-dose trial

The one-dose comparative trial was conducted on a farm in the Midwest and involved more than 2,600 pigs.5 It focused on morbidity, mortality and growth, said Noel Garbes, DVM,  technical services, Zoetis.

At 3 weeks of age, pigs received one, 2 ml dose of either Fostera Gold PCV MH or Circumvent PCV-M G2.

Conducting a trial with this herd was challenging because there were multiple health issues, but the problems encountered were not unlike those often seen in the field, Garbes said. There was influenza on the sow farm and, at the nursery, there were influenza and Streptococcus suis. Finishers developed Actobacillus suis 12 weeks after they were placed, causing eight pigs to die in 1 day, he said, and noted that treatment was administered as indicated.

Oral-fluid and serology sampling was performed throughout the trial. The samples were tested for PCV2 with PCR, but to test for M. hyo, either PCR or ELISA was used.

There were a few samples positive for PCV2 and M. hyo at different points throughout the study, but by the end of the trial at 19 weeks of age, no samples were positive for PCV2. In the Fostera Gold PCV MH group, two of 15 samples were positive for M. hyo by 19 weeks of age, and in the Circumvent PCV-M G2 group, one of 14 was positive and one of 14 was  suspect, he said.

There were no significant differences (p ≥ 0.05) in morbidity or mortality between the two vaccine groups nor in average daily gain (Table 2), Garbes said.

Click table to enlarge

“In this study, one dose of Fostera Gold PCV MH performed similarly to Circumvent PCV-M G2 when administered at weaning,” he said.

Advantages

Fostera Gold PCV MH has a duration of immunity (DOI) of at least 23 weeks for both PCV2 and M. hyo, so pigs are protected throughout the finishing stage. The DOI for Circumvent PCV-M G2 is at least 20 weeks (5 months) for only the PCV2 fraction of the vaccine.6  Other attributes of Fostera Gold PCV MH are safety and broader antigenic coverage,  Garbes said.

“The safety of Fostera Gold PCV MH was demonstrated in the Southeast comparative trial and in a three-state safety study,”7 he said. Garbes attributes the vaccine’s safety to the adjuvant MetaStim®, which is “smooth.”

Research has demonstrated that because the vaccine has two PCV2 genotypes, it  should provide the broadest antigenic coverage available against commonly circulating PCV2 genotypes as well as evolving PCV2 field strains compared to a vaccine with only  one genotype.8

The single, 2 ml dose of Fostera Gold PCV MH is indicated for pigs 3 weeks of age or older. The flexible protocol given as two, 1 ml doses can be started as early as 3 days of age;  however, Garbes and Nemechek prefer the two-dose regimen initiated at 3 weeks of age.

“With two doses,” Garbes explained, “all pigs are more likely to be vaccinated, whereas with one dose, some might be missed. Based on our work in the field, we also think the immune response will be better if you wait until 3 weeks of age to start the vaccine protocol.”

 

 

All trademarks are the property of Zoetis Services LLC or a related company or a licensor unless otherwise noted. Circumvent is a registered trademark of Merck Animal Health.


1 Data on file, Study Report No. 17 PPTBIO-01-01, Zoetis LLC.
2 Data on file, Study Report No. 17 PPTBIO-01-02, Zoetis LLC.
3 Data on file, Study Report No. 16 PRGBIO-01-01, Zoetis LLC.
4 Opriessnig T, et al. A commercial porcine circovirus (PCV) type 2a-based vaccine reduces PCV2d viremia and shedding and prevents PCV2d transmission to naïve pigs under experimental conditions. Vaccine. 2017 Jan 5; 35(2):248-254.
5 Data on file, Study Report No. 17 PPTBIO-01-02, Zoetis LLC.
6 Circumvent PCV-M G2 label, Merck Animal Health.
7 Data on file, Study Report No. 16 PRGBIO-01-01, Zoetis LLC.
8 Data on file, Study Report Zoetis WO1, EpiCC PCV2 Analysis, Zoetis LLC.

 

 

DISCOVERIES, Issue 16
Discoveries is a series of  research news reports written by the editors of Pig Health Today on behalf of the US Pork Business of Zoetis.

FSTRA-00165
March 2019

Share It
Fostera® Gold PCV MH, the Zoetis vaccine against two genotypes of porcine circovirus type 2 and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, performed better in a study than a competitor’s vaccine.

Click an icon to share this information with your industry contacts.



Posted on March 15, 2019

tags: , , , ,
RELATED NEWS



You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Share It
US producers and veterinarians have seen an influx of different types of influenza viruses in the last 10 to 15 years, and that is a major reason why influenza is more difficult to control.

Click an icon to share this information with your industry contacts.
Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.