Sign up now!
Don't show this again
Download the report!Continue to Site >
or wait 7 secs

Thank you for confirming your subscription!

(And remember, if ever you want to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, just click on the links at the bottom of any email.)

We’re glad you’re enjoying Pig Health Today.
Access is free but you’ll need to register to view more content.
Already registered? Sign In
Tap to download the app


Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report


Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
follow us

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Pig Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Pig Health Today | Sponsored by Zoetis

Featured Video Play Icon

Tracheal sampling for M. hyo may hold new benefits

Tracheal sampling is a good way to determine if Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (M. hyo) is present in a herd, but it’s an invasive procedure that can be difficult to accomplish. The procedure, however, may offer a valuable benefit, said Brandi Burton, DVM, swine veterinarian with Suidae Health and Production. The fluid from the tracheal sampling could become an alternative to the lung homogenate that has typically been used for animal inoculation in M. hyo control, she told Pig Health Today.

Burton’s idea was to look at the tracheal fluid collected during diagnostic testing and use it in a solution to inoculate pigs. In theory, she didn’t see any reason why it couldn’t be used, but that theory needed to be proved.

“Right now, the gold standard is to use lung homogenate [as an inoculate] for M. hyo,” Burton said, but that can be costly from an animal-welfare and genetics standpoint. She was looking for an alternative method.

“I’ve had quite a bit of experience with tracheal sampling, so we basically diluted [the trachea fluid] and created an inoculum,” she said. “We intratracheally administered 8 mls of the solution to 30 gilts and tested them 16 days later.”

The gilts were 100% positive for M. hyo, using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test.

Testing the spread

Twenty-six days after the initial inoculation, Burton tested the theory a step further. The way the barn was set up, researchers tested contact and non-contact animals. They inoculated half the gilts in four pens and left the other half non-inoculated. These were the direct-contact animals. Two additional pens had fence-to-fence contact with the inoculated animals, and animals across the aisle were considered non-contact sentinels.

Results of the trial showed:

  • 100% of the direct-contact animals in the pens with the inoculated gilts were positive.
  • 80% of the animals with fence-to-fence contact were positive.
  • 100% of the animals across the aisle from the inoculated gilts were positive.

“We feel relatively successful in that we took those 30 gilts and essentially had 100% positivity within 26 days in a group of 158,” Burton said.

Next steps

Burton said the next step is to determine the infectious dose needed to effectively inoculate the animals. Also, since many veterinarians like to use fogging as an exposure technique, Burton would like to try that protocol.

Additionally, she will look at the seeder ratio. Having 30 gilts inoculate 158 animals is “abnormal,” she said.

“That’s about a 4:1 ratio, and so it’s atypical of M. Hyo,” Burton said. “We want to look further into nailing down the seeder ratio.”

Going forward, Burton hopes to add ELISA and serum testing to the PCR tests for a fuller understanding of the M. hyo inoculant in the herd.
Burton encouraged veterinarians to keep an open mind in thinking about exposure processes for M. hyo.

“It’s definitely a benefit if we don’t have to euthanize animals to collect that lung homogenate,” she said. “Plus, a lot of farms are already doing tracheal samplings…to diagnose the farm. You can just take that sample and…use it again as an inoculum, potentially.”

Best practices

Producers need to understand their production flows when thinking about M. hyo control, Burton said. The financial consequences of M. hyo are seen primarily in grow-finish animals, so it’s important to understand the status of those pigs downstream.

“We know M. hyo doesn’t generally transmit laterally, so it’s almost always coming from the sow farm,” Burton said. She suggested monitoring for the disease with cross-sectional studies.

“Look at five to six different age groups on 1 day and do tracheal sampling along with serum and oral-fluid collections,” Burton said. “You can get a good timeline and see multiple age groups at the same time to…determine their status. Doing that at least twice a year is a good way to keep surveillance [current] and modify protocols as needed.”

Timing is important too. Burton suggested producers and veterinarians find medications that can control clinical signs early on and determine through the flow when those medications should be administered.

“You don’t want to be too far behind the ball, but you also don’t want to be too far in front of it,” she said. “You want to be right on top of it before it can become a bigger issue than it needs to be.”

The farm on which the original study was done is considering an elimination program for M. hyo, Burton said. She wants to employ the tracheal inoculation program with herd closure to see if time-to-negative-production can be shortened and to determine the minimum dosage needed as well as the dilution ratio.

Although there is a negative stigma associated with tracheal sampling because of its invasive nature, the ability to use the fluid in a way that may have long-term benefits could make the effort that much more indispensable.


Share It
Tracheal sampling is a good way to determine if M. hyo is present in a herd, but it’s an invasive procedure that can be difficult to accomplish. However, it may offer a valuable benefit.

Click an icon to share this information with your industry contacts.

Posted on September 9, 2020

tags: , ,
  • Zoetis releases update of M. Hyo Manual

    Zoetis has released an update of the comprehensive manual, “A Contemporary Review of Mycoplasma Hyopneumoniae Control Strategies,” with 14 articles developed by swine-disease experts specializing in this pathogen.

  • Start with the gilt-development unit for Mhp elimination

    US pig producers have made a big push to eliminate Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (Mhp) from their herds as a way to capture more value in finishing pigs.

  • M. hyo elimination or control: ‘We have the tools to succeed’

    Hog farmers and veterinarians no longer have to accept the poorer performance that results from M. hyo infection. Whether the decision is to control or eliminate M. hyo, there are numerous tools available, and the payoff is real.

  • Don’t lose sight of M. hyo while battling other swine pathogens

    TOOLBOX, Issue 1: An interview with Lucina Galina Pantoja, DVM, PhD, Director, Swine Technical Services, Zoetis 

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Share It
It’s not unrealistic to say that if you checked the nasal cavities or tonsils of any group of pigs, you would find Strep suis. While the strain and impact can vary widely, this commensal bacterium is on virtually every hog farm.

Click an icon to share this information with your industry contacts.
Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.