Sign up now!
Don't show this again
Download the report!Continue to Site >
or wait 7 secs

Thank you for confirming your subscription!

(And remember, if ever you want to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, just click on the links at the bottom of any email.)

We’re glad you’re enjoying Pig Health Today.
Access is free but you’ll need to register to view more content.
Already registered? Sign In
Tap to download the app


Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report


Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
follow us

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Pig Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Pig Health Today | Sponsored by Zoetis


Take a process-driven approach to influenza control

Should US pork producers strive to produce an influenza-negative pig? Yes, said Montserrat Torremorell, DVM, PhD, if they want to see the benefits of increased productivity, reduced secondary infections and antibiotic use, reduced influenza dissemination, decreased influenza diversity and reduced risk of zoonotic infections. Torremorell, a professor in the Department of Veterinary Population Medicine at the University of Minnesota, shared her views in a presentation at the 2020 American Association of Swine Veterinarians annual meeting held earlier this year.

“Piglets are born without influenza — it doesn’t cross the placenta, so when they’re weaned they often go positive,” she said. “We want to decrease the likelihood that they’ll get infected.”

The first step is to properly monitor the pigs to determine status, she said, noting “a process-driven mentality” is necessary. It’s also important to recognize the variability inherent within and between groups of pigs, she noted.

Seasonality is also a factor. “December to May is the seasonal pattern, even though influenza can be circulating in a facility year-round,” she said.

The USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service explains there are many different subtypes of influenza A viruses. These subtypes are classified based on a combination of two groups of proteins on the surface of the influenza A virus: hemagglutinin or “H” proteins, of which there are 17 (H1–H17), and neuraminidase or “N” proteins, of which there are 10 (N1–N10). Many different combinations of “H” and “N” proteins are possible. Each combination is considered a different subtype, and each subtype can be further divided into many distinct strains, which can make control that much more challenging.

Points to consider

A comprehensive, process-driven approach is necessary for any control program to be successful, Torremorell pointed out. Primary factors to consider include sow vaccination, pig and sow movement, people and fomites, and gilt introduction.

Sow vaccination: Vaccination of sows can reduce influenza in weaning-age pigs, Torremorell said, however, the influenza virus is very diverse. As a rule of thumb, vaccination decreases the level of infection.

“We saw a decrease from 7% down to 2.5% with the use of one vaccine,” she said. “Where vaccination wasn’t used, influenza was significantly higher.”

Pig and sow movement: Influenza can transmit rapidly, Torremorell said. If pigs come into contact with contaminated surfaces and aerosols, they’re susceptible to contracting the virus. In addition, cross-fostering and nurse sows can contribute to spread, she said.

“If there isn’t good immunity, pigs will transmit influenza rapidly when they’re moved,” Torremorell said. “Even if you’ve used a good vaccine, there is still the likelihood of transmission when you move pigs. In fact, it’s not uncommon to see 100% of the pigs infected at weaning.”

There are two types of influenza-positive farms, in her assessment: those with pigs infected before processing and those with pigs infected after processing, she said.

“I used to say influenza was a disease of the second week of age, but in some farms it’s much sooner than that and I think it has to do with movement,” Torremorell said. “When there is influenza at the farm, the chance of getting it is very high, so the intervention time makes a difference.”

There is also viable virus in the udder skin of sows, which has implications for nurse-sow management, she added. Adopted pigs became infected more rapidly than control litters in research studies.

“We also saw piglets infecting the sows, which emphasizes the importance of identifying where the virus is,” she said.

People and fomites: Biosecurity procedures should include segregation of materials and changes in personnel protective equipment (gloves, boots, etc.), Torremorell said. Be mindful of the risk of people introducing new strains. Seasonal flu vaccination of farm workers is recommended.

Gilt introduction: If the gilts are positive upon entering the farm, you’re more likely to wean positive pigs, Torremorell said.

“Test, isolate, vaccinate and be mindful of movements,” she said.

“Increase sow vaccination, decrease exposure in terms of movement in the farrowing rooms, and do regular surveillance,” Torremorell stressed. “Maintain a process-driven mentality if you really want to have influenza control, because we see variation over time.”

Continually remind employees of the important role they play in controlling influenza, she added. The virus can change, and new strategies will likely need to be implemented.


Share It
Should US pork producers strive to produce an influenza-negative pig?

Click an icon to share this information with your industry contacts.

Posted on August 31, 2020

tags: , , ,
  • New approaches to influenza control look promising

    Influenza-A virus of swine (IAV-S) is a thorn in the side of US pork producers, and it’s a difficult thorn to remove. If the virus were more pathogenic, veterinarians and producers would probably talk about it more.

  • Understanding which farm factors drive Influenza infection

    US producers and veterinarians have seen an influx of different types of influenza viruses in the last 10 to 15 years, and that is a major reason why influenza is more difficult to control.

  • Research confirms co-circulation of multiple influenza strains

    Influenza A virus in swine (IAV-S) is increasingly challenging for US producers, primarily because the epidemiology of IAV-S involves a highly diverse pool of viruses.

  • 8 ways to boost immunity in livestock

    Victor Cortese, DVM, PhD, drew on his decades of field experience and expertise in immunology to offer tips for optimizing immunity in swine herds in the face of IAV-S.

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Share It
Water doesn’t get the attention it deserves because it is abundant, easy to access and inexpensive, but that will change in the future, said John Patience, PhD, professor at Iowa State University.

Click an icon to share this information with your industry contacts.
Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.