fbpx
Sign up now!
Don't show this again
Download the report!Continue to Site >
or wait 7 secs

Thank you for confirming your subscription!

(And remember, if ever you want to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, just click on the links at the bottom of any email.)

We’re glad you’re enjoying Pig Health Today.
Access is free but you’ll need to register to view more content.
Already registered? Sign In
Tap to download the app
X
Share
X

REPORTS

Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report

Favorites

Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
CREATE
X
NEXT
PORK POULTRY
follow us


You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Pig Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Pig Health Today | Sponsored by Zoetis

.
Featured Video Play Icon

Survey says: RWA production adversely affects pig health and welfare

Swine producers and veterinarians responding to a national survey said pressure to maintain the raised without antibiotics (RWA) label sometimes compromises animal health and welfare, Jennifer Wishnie, DVM, assistant professor at California Polytechnic State University, told Pig Health Today.

This finding was a key observation of the study and was “concerning,” Wishnie said.

This is one of the first surveys aimed at obtaining the perspectives of veterinarians and producers about the impact of RWA production, she noted.

The survey, conducted for swine, poultry, turkey, beef and dairy, was intended to determine how raising animals without the use of antibiotics affects different production parameters. There were 148 completed responses from veterinarians and producers for the swine portion of the survey and just over 500 responses for the total survey across the food-animal industries. Both RWA and conventional respondents were included, Wishnie explained.

RWA programs cost more

Raising pigs without antibiotics negatively affected performance parameters such as feed efficiency and mortality compared to conventional production, respondents said. The cost of production was higher in RWA compared to conventional systems, according to survey results.

The reasons producers opted to initiate RWA production were primarily market-driven: better prices and access to a niche market.

Producers who stuck with conventional production did so because they were either concerned about the impact of RWA production on the health and welfare of the animals, or they had a responsible antibiotic-use system they liked, Wishnie said. She noted that pork producers are well-versed in the responsible use of antibiotics, thanks to the longstanding Pork Quality Assurance program.

Reality versus expectation

Wishnie explained that across the food-animal industries, both RWA and conventional respondents felt food safety as well as animal health and welfare are compromised by RWA production.

However, respondents from all the food-animal industries believed their customers thought RWA production improved food safety and animal health and welfare.

This raises the question: “What do the customers actually believe?” That question wasn’t addressed in this survey but should be the next step in a process to better understand the situation, Wishnie commented.

Although the food-animal industry has provided significant educational outreach to customers about “why and how antibiotics are used for animal health and welfare,” the message may not be getting through, she said.

For the pork industry, the survey’s take-away message is understanding that pressure from demands to maintain a label may adversely affect animal health and welfare in RWA production. This presents a real challenge for producers who want to maintain animal health and welfare, while at the same time protect human health, Wishnie said.




Posted on September 3, 2019

tags: , , ,
RELATED NEWS
  • Raising pigs without antibiotics? Plan to ‘sweat the small stuff’

    Follow this rule if you’re raising pigs without antibiotics: “Sweat the small stuff.” That’s the advice from Doug MacDougald, DVM, for any farm that wants to eliminate antibiotics without compromising animal welfare and performance.

  • Pork industry needs to balance animal well-being with antibiotic pressures

    After 37 years of swine veterinary practice, John Baker, DVM, Boonville, Indiana, sees producers and veterinarians entering a new era in antibiotic management — one that focuses not on arbitrarily reducing antibiotics but using them responsibly to ensure animal...




You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.