Sign up now!
Don't show this again
Download the report!Continue to Site >
or wait 7 secs

Thank you for confirming your subscription!

(And remember, if ever you want to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, just click on the links at the bottom of any email.)

We’re glad you’re enjoying Pig Health Today.
Access is free but you’ll need to register to view more content.
Already registered? Sign In
Tap to download the app


Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report


Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
follow us

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Pig Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Pig Health Today | Sponsored by Zoetis

Featured Video Play Icon

Simpler, less costly monitoring methods helping pork industry get a better read on PRRS

Newer testing methods for the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus are not only simpler and less costly than traditional procedures, they are also helping farms more accurately track the virus through different production segments, Daniel Linhares, DVM, PhD, told Pig Health Today.

For example, collecting processing fluids during castration and tail docking has proved to be “a very powerful and easy method” that can help determine if sows are producing PRRS-negative pigs or if a PRRS virus elimination plan is a success, he said.

In the nursery, collecting oral fluids after sows and baby pigs chew on ropes provides a “family sample” and is a useful way to evaluate the PRRS status of litters ready for weaning, he said.

Look more, find more

Both mass-collection methods require far less labor than conventional monitoring that requires an ear prick or drawing blood. Furthermore, they allow veterinarians to evaluate groups of pigs rather than individual animals.

“You’re looking at more and you find more,” said Linhares, an assistant professor at Iowa State University.

Monitoring production data daily or weekly is another way to monitor for the PRRS virus — one that complements processing- and oral-fluid sampling, he said.

Producers can also “mix and match” monitoring methods to suit their needs, and some are using all three methods to monitor for PRRS virus as well as other infectious diseases, such as porcine circovirus and porcine epidemic diarrhea virus.

Processing fluids

Processing fluids for sampling involves placing all tails and testicles removed into a bucket lined with a plastic bag then cheesecloth, secured around the top of the bucket with a large rubber band. Tissue fluids drain through the cheesecloth into the plastic bag.

After collection, a small hole is made into the bottom of the plastic bag, and the fluids are funneled into testing vials and sent to a lab, usually for testing by PCR (polymerase chain reaction), he explained.

Data from veterinary diagnostic labs indicate processing-fluid sampling now accounts for 7% of all samples submitted for PRRS virus testing, so “it’s really taken off” over the past year. “It’s cheap, it’s easy, it’s a no brainer,” the veterinarian said.

Oral fluids

Oral fluids are gathered by hanging ropes in pens where both sows and baby pigs can chew on them.

“We’ve found that it’s not consistent if you try to collect only from piglets. But if you hang the rope where the sow can see it, it’s amazing…As soon as the baby piglets see mom interacting with the rope, they all copy her behavior and chew on the rope,” he said, adding that oral-fluids testing is highly sensitive for PRRS virus detection.

Production results can be monitored daily or weekly. Using a cloud-based reporting system developed by Iowa State University, producers can enter production data into a mobile device.  If the program detects a shift in the production parameters being monitored — an increase in abortions, for instance — it sends an alert to the user.





Posted on May 10, 2019

tags: , ,

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Share It
It’s not unrealistic to say that if you checked the nasal cavities or tonsils of any group of pigs, you would find Strep suis. While the strain and impact can vary widely, this commensal bacterium is on virtually every hog farm.

Click an icon to share this information with your industry contacts.
Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.