fbpx
Sign up now!
Don't show this again
Download the report!Continue to Site >
or wait 7 secs

Thank you for confirming your subscription!

(And remember, if ever you want to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, just click on the links at the bottom of any email.)

We’re glad you’re enjoying Pig Health Today.
Access is free but you’ll need to register to view more content.
Already registered? Sign In
Tap to download the app
X
Share
X

REPORTS

Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report

Favorites

Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
CREATE
X
NEXT
PORK POULTRY
follow us


You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Pig Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Pig Health Today | Sponsored by Zoetis

.
Featured Video Play Icon

Simple biosecurity measures offer significant production gains, scientists say

Taking simple steps to improve biosecurity and welfare on pig farms can significantly reduce the amount of antimicrobials farmers need to administer, scientists say.

Researchers in Finland found that poor air quality and water equipment problems could lead to farmers using up to 40% more antimicrobials than farms with high levels of biosecurity.

Yet simple steps such as introducing better-quality enrichment material could lead to a drastic reduction in antimicrobial use while improving animal welfare and cutting production costs in the process.

Speaking to Pig Health Today, animal scientist Anna Stygar of Finland’s Luke Institute said the study aimed to determine if there was a link between biosecurity levels and pig health — and an indirect link to antibiotics use.

Using data collected between 2011 and 2013, the study analyzed data from vets on antibiotic consumption, biosecurity and welfare conditions across almost 2000 Finnish farms.

The researchers also examined meat inspection scores taken the slaughter house, before using the data to model microbial consumption.

“Our results found that on farms with water equipment problems, there were elevated numbers of antimicrobial treatments due to lameness,” Stygar said.

“The number of treatments could be as much as 40% higher per batch compared to farms with excellent biosecurity. That means farmers are making financial losses due to substantial medical expenses.

“Meanwhile if you look at farms which have average or poor amounts of enrichment material, in those farms we saw elevated antimicrobial treatments due to tail-biting — again about 40% more,” she added.

Most significantly, problems with air quality saw antimicrobial treatments reach as much as double those administered on farms with good biosecurity.

“The main message is that sometimes very simple methods…are very beneficial,” Stygar said. “Not only can they improve welfare, but also bring substantial financial savings by reducing medical costs.

“Of course there are additional benefits in terms of limiting antimicrobial resistance,” she added.

“We therefore hope farmers will look closely at their farm’s conditions to improve the health of the animals and maybe reduce antibiotics use in the future.”

 

The abstract, “Is it possible to reduce antimicrobial consumption by improving biosecurity and welfare at pig farms,” was published in the Book of Abstracts of the 69th Annual Meeting of the European Federation of Animal Science. Download the abstract book here.




Posted on February 6, 2019

tags: ,
RELATED NEWS
  • Gut bacteria deserve renewed focus

    With the FDA’s new veterinary feed directive (VFD) rules changing the way some feed-grade antimicrobials are used on the farm, other options are gaining more attention.

  • UK pig sector sets new targets for critically important antibiotics use

    UK pig producers are being asked to reduce their use of certain “critically important” antibiotics under new guidelines adopted by the sector’s independent agency promoting responsible medicine use.

  • US government invests $11M into antimicrobial resistance research

    The United States’ National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) is investing $11 million into research that could help reduce the amount of antimicrobials used in pig production. The funding is being made available for projects that are investigating ways to...




You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.