Sign up now!
Don't show this again
Tap to download the app


Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report


Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
follow us

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Pig Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Pig Health Today | Sponsored by Zoetis


Scientists to study true costs of PRRS to US hog farmers

The true costs of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) to US pig farms is set to be investigated by scientists looking at the effects of the disease on the country’s pork sector.

Researchers at Iowa State University are embarking on a three-year study to find out how PRRS is affecting US pig farm profitability and sustainability, reports National Hog Farmer.

Funded by the National Pork Board, the study will reveal how much PRRS costs farmers each year, as well as investigate how effective management practices introduced to control the disease have been.

The study is the second to be carried out by the team, after research done in 2012 showed that annual losses associated with the virus were as much as $664 million, making PRRS the costliest disease to affect the sector.

Since then, producers have implemented various practices to control the disease, including vaccines and strategic sanitation of facilities. The updated study will investigate what impact those efforts have made.

Research leader Donald Holtkamp, associate professor of veterinary diagnostic and production medicine, said PRRS remains a recurring challenge for the US pork sector, with 20 to 40% of breeding herds experiencing outbreaks each year.

“It is a clever virus,” he said. “It changes rapidly to keep a pig’s immune system from fighting it off. We have vaccine, but their efficacy is often limited.”

Holtkamp said the study will use data from pork producers, as well as surveys and diagnostic data from local vets.

He and his team will release quarterly updates on the economic effects of the virus for the next three years.

“This is a way to measure the progress we’ve been making against the pathogen and the disease it causes,” Holtkamp added.

“We’ll be able to see if we’re moving the ball on PRRS. I think we are and will continue to do so.”

Full article

tags: ,
  • Dee: Both pigs and caregivers suffered in antibiotic-free study

    A study looking at how PRRS-challenged pigs performed in antibiotic-free production systems needed to be stopped for welfare reasons so the pigs could be treated with antibiotics, according to Scott Dee, DVM, director of research, Pipestone Veterinary Services (PVS)....

  • 11 barriers to reducing antimicrobial use

    Inflexible production systems and high production costs are preventing pig producers from reducing antimicrobial use on pig farms, according to scientists.

  • Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome control in Asia

    by Marlon L. Linatoc Regional Technical Manager Swine Asia-Pacific and Greater China, Zoetis Inc.    Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) continues to be one of the most economically devastating viral diseases affecting pig farms in major swine...

  • Pork producers gain ground against PRRS with reduced production losses

    Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) remains one of the most costly viruses infecting US herds. But an Iowa State University study showed the annual cost of PRRS dropped nearly $100 million in 6 years since 2010 when PRRS was at full force.

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.