Sign up now!
Don't show this again

Thank you for confirming your subscription!

(And remember, if ever you want to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, just click on the links at the bottom of any email.)
Tap to download the app
X
Share
X

REPORTS

Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report

Favorites

Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
CREATE
X
NEXT
PORK POULTRY
follow us


You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Pig Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Pig Health Today | Sponsored by Zoetis

.
Featured Video Play Icon

Taking oral-fluid samples for PRRS: How many and when?

Oral-fluid sampling can provide a simple, reliable way to surveil for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), Marisa Rotolo, DVM, of Iowa State University, reported at the 2017 American Association of Swine Veterinarians conference.

Rotolo and colleagues came to this conclusion based on a research project they conducted using a statistical tool known as spatial autocorrelation. Spatial autocorrelation, in simplest terms, means everything is related to everything else, but near things are more related than distant things, Rotolo explained in an interview with Pig Health Today after her presentation.

For the pork industry, this would mean that pigs in pens near each other are more likely to have the same disease status than pens that are farther apart, she said.

The investigators also determined if it’s better to collect samples for PRRSV testing that are equal distances from each other — a process known as fixed-spatial sampling — versus collecting samples from random locations throughout a barn, she said.

For their research project, Rotolo and colleagues collected oral-fluid samples in three wean-to-finish barns weekly from 108 pens with about 25 pigs per pen. In all, they had 972 samples, which were completely randomized, then tested for PRRSV with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. They used statistical analyses to compare the probability of detection based on random versus fixed-spatial sampling.

They found that PRRSV did indeed exhibit spatial autocorrelation and that oral sampling using fixed sampling was an effective strategy that can provide a good representation of what’s going on in a barn.

Oral-fluid sampling, she added, is a particularly attractive sampling method because it’s easy to perform and takes only one person. In contrast, collecting serum samples requires two people — one to restrain the animal and another to collect the sample — which also increases labor costs, Rotolo said.


tags: , ,
RELATED NEWS
  • Processing fluids helping to fine tune diagnostics in swine herds thought to be PRRS-negative

    Collecting aggregate samples of processing fluids during tail docking and castration is proving to be an excellent way to monitor herds for porcine reproductive and respiratory disease (PRRS) virus, Will Lopez, DVM, Iowa State University, told Pig Health Today.

  • Tackling PRRS: Managing outbreaks to limit damage

    According to a new guide on PRRS management, understanding how to manage the costly disease can help improve pig health and welfare, while increasing productivity.

  • Barn location can impact PRRS exposure risk

    Several factors go into selecting a site for a pork-production unit, but research shows there are a couple more — specifically, terrain and vegetation — that may influence exposure to the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.

  • Early PRRS vaccination helps protect pigs through slaughter

    A new, single-dose vaccine for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) has been shown to protect pigs from before weaning to slaughter, helping prevent secondary infections and performance losses associated with the costly disease.




You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.