Sign up now!
Don't show this again

Thank you for confirming your subscription!

(And remember, if ever you want to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, just click on the links at the bottom of any email.)
Tap to download the app


Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report


Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
follow us

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Pig Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Pig Health Today | Sponsored by Zoetis

Featured Video Play Icon

‘Race to zero’ not the answer in antibiotics debate

Watch the interview

Regulations around the use of antibiotics in feed should not encourage a race to “no antibiotics ever” production systems that could compromise pig welfare, according to a pork-industry veterinarian.

Liz Wagstrom, DVM, chief veterinarian for the National Pork Producers Council, said the introduction of the new veterinary feed directive rules in 2017 was an important step in ensuring responsible use of antibiotics in swine and other food animals.

But she warned that trying to emulate the poultry sector’s rapid shift to raising broilers without antibiotics could put pig welfare at risk.

Speaking to Pig Health Today, Wagstrom said that while the pork industry was supportive of efforts to use antibiotics responsibly, it’s also important for regulations not to go too far.

“Even though there’s no scientific data which supported the tightening [of antibiotic usage], we did feel it was good to have a regulated or more rigorous need for the veterinarian to be involved in the decisions,” she said.

“Our Pork Quality Assurance program has always said that veterinarians should be involved in all decisions, regardless of where the distribution chain was, so that was a good thing.”

However, she added, “We are very concerned if the FDA goes any further. We don’t want restrictions on preventing use of antibiotics, and we don’t want arbitrary restrictions on how long they can be used in certain situations.”

Wagstrom said that the FDA has begun to ask veterinarians to provide information on how antibiotics which don’t have treatment durations listed on them are being used — something she said might indicate plans to add arbitrary limits to some products in the future.

Before further proposals are made, she suggested the pork industry could look at ways to limit the need for antibiotics itself, whether through production changes, pig flows, vaccination or hygiene protocols.

There is also benefit in helping retailers and processors understand the complexities in pig production, ensuring they not encourage a “race to zero” in a bid to be able to promote pigs raised without antibiotics.

“Let’s look at what’s right for the pig, our production systems, what’s still going to protect public health, and what complies with regulations,” she said.

“Let’s look at this more holistically than the race to zero, and separate marketing from science.”

To help retailers and consumers understand why antibiotics are an important part of the production system, Wagstrom said vets and producers need to become industry advocates and be prepared to educate their neighbors and the media on this important health and welfare issue.


Posted on September 12, 2017

tags: , , , ,
  • Calls to cut antibiotics could hurt pig health, vet warns

    Calls to ban antibiotics for disease protection in pig and other livestock systems could damage animal welfare and compromise the United States’ food system, industry leaders say.

  • Research boost needed to protect US pig sector

    The US government needs to renew its commitment to funding agricultural research if the pork sector is to have the tools it needs to fight new and emerging diseases.

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.