Sign up now!
Don't show this again
Download the report!Continue to Site >
or wait 7 secs

Thank you for confirming your subscription!

(And remember, if ever you want to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, just click on the links at the bottom of any email.)

We’re glad you’re enjoying Pig Health Today.
Access is free but you’ll need to register to view more content.
Already registered? Sign In
Tap to download the app


Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report


Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
follow us

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Pig Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Pig Health Today | Sponsored by Zoetis


Be prepared for surgical castration and tail docking ban, EU producers told

Europe’s pig producers should prepare themselves for an eventual ban on surgical castration and tail docking across the continent, according to a leading industry expert.

Sandra Edwards, Professor of Agriculture at the UK’s University of Newcastle, said animal welfare concerns from consumers and retailers meant producers would increase pressure to stop using the practices.

And she said that European policymakers could make moves to force the abolition of surgical castration and force compliance with tail docking rules by as early as 2018.

Speaking at the Herning Pig Congress in Denmark, Edwards said farmers needed to be prepared to change their production practices so they could comply with rules that would inevitably be introduced.

“Consumers are interested in welfare,” she said. “They like natural behaviors and living conditions, and they believe animals shouldn’t experience pain.

“That makes it hard for them to accept that we do things that cause pain for management reasons.”

Alternative castration methods

Edwards said that the European Commission had called on the industry to develop alternative methods to surgical castration by 2018, such as immunological castration and new breeding strategies — an area the industry would see ‘major moves’ in over the next few years.

Similarly the Commission wanted to see producers stop routine tail docking within the next 18 months, and had called on member states to implement action plans to ensure its rules were met.

“As an industry our goal has to be to abolish tail biting and tail docking,” she told delegates. “Society won’t give us a choice in the long-term.”

Edwards said there were more than 100 reasons why pigs tail bite, ranging from genetics and nutrition to health, climate and environment.

Individual approach

A four-year study had also found that three-times more tail biting occurred in slatted systems compared with straw systems.

However, while systems were being developed to help limit the risk, the best solution was to take an individual-farm approach, which involves training farmers and staff to identify issues early-on.

“Developing early warning systems for biting outbreaks [could be one solution],” she said. “We know there are certain changes in behavior before animals bite, and if we could intervene that could avoid the problem.

“We need to take small steps forward while we learn how to get it right. We have to know that developing skills and spotting problems early on is going to be key.”

Posted on November 29, 2016

tags: , ,

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.