Sign up now!
Don't show this again
Download the report!Continue to Site >
or wait 7 secs

Thank you for confirming your subscription!

(And remember, if ever you want to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, just click on the links at the bottom of any email.)

We’re glad you’re enjoying Pig Health Today.
Access is free but you’ll need to register to view more content.
Already registered? Sign In
Tap to download the app


Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report


Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
follow us

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Pig Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Pig Health Today | Sponsored by Zoetis

Featured Video Play Icon

Pork industry teaming with NAHMS, FDA to score antibiotic use

Watch the interview

From the public to government agencies to producers, everyone wants a clear assessment of antibiotic usage on farms. But how should that be measured?

National Pork Board’s David Pyburn, DVM, talked with Pig Health Today about two initiatives under way to help regulators grade the pork industry’s commitment to responsible antibiotic usage.

The first involves a survey, initiated by USDA’s National Animal Health Monitoring System (NAHMS), which began in June 2017.

“They came to us last winter with a monitoring tool and asked for our input to ensure that we’d get the most out of it for the industry and also for the public,” said Dave Pyburn, DVM, senior vice president, science and technology, National Pork Board (NPB). “They can see why antibiotics are needed on the farm and why we use them for pigs’ health and welfare.”

The survey involves farms from the top 17 pork-production states that have more than 1,000 pigs on site annually. “If a producer meets those criteria, then he is in a pool to be drawn randomly,” Pyburn told Pig Health Today.

The veterinarian said it was important for industry to establish a baseline for antibiotic usage so the pork industry can demonstrate its commitment to responsible antibiotic management. Participation is strictly voluntary, however, and the information collected is ghosted and not tied to any individual producer.

Participating producers are being asked to share data on antibiotic use in 2016 — which products, when and how much. NAHMS will then come back in a year or two for the same data to measure the effect of FDA’s new rules, which require veterinarians to issue a veterinary feed directive for any medication deemed medically important by the agency.

Pyburn cited a second initiative, funded by the Pork Checkoff, which began a year ago with Peter Davies, DVM, a renowned antibiotic expert from the University of Minnesota. NPB asked Davies to evaluate and develop meaningful measures for antibiotic use on hog farms.

“We can’t just measure usage. We wanted him to show how to measure stewardship and why antibiotics are used,” Pyburn said. “He looked at the variables to be measured and developed an analysis system. He got the project rolling.”

Since then, FDA proposed a 5-year effort to do the same thing in beef, poultry and dairy. Davies was awarded the pork project. “Pork Checkoff seeded the project, got it started early and now FDA is taking over the funding,” Pyburn explained, adding that these initiatives benefit producers and consumers alike.

“It’s important for the people, who likely haven’t been on a farm recently, to understand why we use antibiotics,” he concluded. “If we don’t use them when needed, we’ll have animal-health and welfare issues and, possibly, food-safety issues.”



Posted on August 10, 2017

tags: , , , , ,

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Share It
Challenges associated with controlling porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) have resulted in the increased use of molecular diagnostic tests and sequencing, according to Phillip Gauger, DVM, PhD, Iowa State University.

Click an icon to share this information with your industry contacts.
Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.