Sign up now!
Don't show this again

Thank you for confirming your subscription!

(And remember, if ever you want to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, just click on the links at the bottom of any email.)
Tap to download the app
X
Share
X

REPORTS

Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report

Favorites

Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
CREATE
X
NEXT
PORK POULTRY
follow us


You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Pig Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Pig Health Today | Sponsored by Zoetis

.
Featured Video Play Icon

PCV3: A challenge independent from PCV2

Anyone involved in raising pigs is aware of porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2), but new on the scene is porcine circovirus type 3 (PCV3). Although the two viruses are both circular DNA viruses in the same family, they are separate and distinct.

“When you look at the two viruses from a molecular level, they’re very different,” Emily Byers, DVM, Prestage Farms, told Pig Health Today. Her extensive experience involves the virus in a gilt-acclimation site tied to a 7,500-head sow farm and the related down-stream grow/finish production.

Complicating matters, PCV3 can present similar clinical symptoms as PCV2 — post-weaning multi-systemic wasting syndrome, porcine dermatitis and nephropathy syndrome, and porcine circovirus associated disease (PCVAD).

“Typical clinical signs that would be attributed to PCV2 in growing pigs, gilts and sows,” Byers noted. “We’d have sows that would be healthy one day and dead the next.”

But overall, the disease progression was gradual. She pointed out that from the time clinical signs started to surface until the farm received a confirmed diagnosis, it took about 18 months. Part of that was due to not having a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test available to identify PCV3. Byer would send tissues in for testing and get lymphoid, skin and kidney lesions suggestive of PCVAD, but PCR and immunohistochemistry test results would consistently come back negative for PCV2.

“We knew something was not quite right,” she recalled. Eventually a newly developed test detected PCV3 in mummified fetuses. Because there is no vaccine or known treatment options, Byer said “we tried to ride it out. We did not want to pursue feedback or a live-virus inoculation because we felt that was too uncontrolled. Over time, performance improved.”

But there remain many unknowns, including how the virus entered the herd. She added that the sow herd was negative for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome and remained so.

Based on limited work on PCV3, Byers believes that it, like PCV2, is widespread in US herds. She and her colleagues don’t know what triggered the virus to cause disease. And because it’s a different virus, the assumption is that vaccinating pigs for PCV2 will not provide protection against PCV3.

“There’s a huge knowledge gap [about this virus],” she said. “We’re starting to get some traction, but we have a lot of research to do on this virus to fully understand the implications.”

Meanwhile, her advice is for producers and veterinarians to be vigilant with this virus, especially when there are clinical signs.

“I think back to reports of PCV2 as it was emerging; there were sporadic reports of similar disease in grow/finish pigs,” Byers recalled. “Then over time it grew into what is now considered among the most significant pathogens in our industry.”

 

 


tags: , ,
RELATED NEWS
  • Don’t get complacent with PCV2 protection

    Vaccines for porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) currently do an adequate job of cross protecting against new genotypes of the virus, but swine veterinarians and producers shouldn’t let their guard down.

  • PCV2: Future considerations for an evolving virus

    Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) may not be a new virus challenge for pork producers and swine veterinarians, but it remains a constant challenge.

  • Colostrum may be best sample for PCV2 on sow farms

    Colostrum may be the best sample to test for determining whether porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) is present in sow herds, according to researchers at Iowa State University (ISU).

  • PCV3 may be a bigger problem than expected

    The emergence of novel porcine circovirus-3 (PCV3) in US pig herds requires closer research into whether the disease is commonly circulating in the country’s hog population, scientists say.




You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.