fbpx
Sign up now!
Don't show this again
Download the report!Continue to Site >
or wait 7 secs

Thank you for confirming your subscription!

(And remember, if ever you want to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, just click on the links at the bottom of any email.)

We’re glad you’re enjoying Pig Health Today.
Access is free but you’ll need to register to view more content.
Already registered? Sign In
Tap to download the app
X
Share
X

REPORTS

Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report

Favorites

Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
CREATE
X
NEXT
PORK POULTRY
follow us


You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Pig Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Pig Health Today | Sponsored by Zoetis

.
oropharyngeal swabs

Oropharyngeal swabs offer alternative for PRRSV diagnosis in wean-age pigs

Taking oropharyngeal (OP) swabs — that is, samples from the tonsils — appears to be an effective alternative means for detecting porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) in wean-age pigs, especially when the prevalence of infection is high.1

PRRSV monitoring of weaned pigs on sow farms is usually based on serum samples, Kylie Glisson, a student at North Carolina State University’s College of Veterinary Medicine, explained at the 2017 meeting of the American Association of Swine Veterinarians. She and fellow investigators sought to find a less invasive and time-consuming testing method.

For their study, Glisson and colleagues chose OP swabbing because it targets the tonsillar area and has been used successfully to detect other pathogens such as influenza A virus of swine, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and porcine circovirus type 2.

They obtained samples from weaned pigs on two sow farms that had each been diagnosed with PRRSV infection 2 months before the start of the study. Both farms were visited twice, 2 weeks apart. The investigators sampled 100 pigs by inserting the swab in the back of the oral cavity and swabbing the soft palate vigorously for at least 5 seconds. They also collected serum on the same pigs for PRRSV testing in their study, sponsored by Zoetis.

The overall sensitivity with OP swabbing was nearly 83% based on true positives validated by the presence of virus in serum. Although the results suggest that OP swabbing is an effective, alternative means for PRRSV detection in weaned pigs when the infection prevalence is high, its use for PRRSV in chronically infected herds needs further study, Glisson cautioned.

She noted that the OP-swabbing technique has one other advantage: It’s easy to teach to farm employees.

 

 

 

1. Glisson K, et al. An evaluation of oropharyngeal swabbing as a diagnostic technique for the detection of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) in weaned pigs. In: Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Swine Veterinarians (February 25-28, 2017). Page 65.

 

 

 

 




Posted on May 19, 2017

tags: , , ,
RELATED NEWS



You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Share It
It’s not unrealistic to say that if you checked the nasal cavities or tonsils of any group of pigs, you would find Strep suis. While the strain and impact can vary widely, this commensal bacterium is on virtually every hog farm.

Click an icon to share this information with your industry contacts.
Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.