Sign up now!
Don't show this again
Tap to download the app
X
Share
X

REPORTS

Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report

Favorites

Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
CREATE
X
NEXT
PORK POULTRY
follow us


You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Pig Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Pig Health Today | Sponsored by Zoetis

.

New FDA guidelines: Rating an animal antibiotic’s importance to humans

The new industry guidelines issued by the US Food and Drug Administration in December suggest removing performance claims from food-animal antimicrobials deemed “medically important” to humans and reserving those feed additives for treating controlling and preventing specific diseases.

The guidelines also recommend limiting performance claims — increased rate of weight gain and improved feed conversion, for instance — to certain antimicrobials that are never or rarely used in human medicine.

How does FDA determine which antimicrobials are “medically important”? Basically, the agency asks five questions about each antibiotic:

  1. Is it used to treat enteric pathogens that cause foodborne disease in humans?
  2. Is it the sole therapy or one of few alternatives to treat serious human disease or a drug that is an essential component among many antimicrobials in treatment of human disease?
  3. Is it used to treat enteric pathogens in non-foodborne disease?
  4. Is there cross-resistance within the drug class or linked resistance with other drug classes?
  5. How easily does resistance to a drug cross over to other genera and species of organisms?


Making the grade

If the answer to questions 1 and 2 is yes, the antimicrobial is considered “critically important.” If either question draws a nod, the antimicrobial is considered “highly important.”  If the answer to questions 1 and 2 is no, but yes to questions 3, 4 or 5, the antimicrobial is rated “important” to human health.  All other antimicrobials are considered non-medically important.

Under the new guidelines, producers will be advised to obtain a VFD order before any medically important antibiotics are used in poultry, and then these antimicrobials should only be used to prevent, control or treat a disease indicated on the product label.

Table 1 lists FDA’s current rankings of commonly used poultry antimicrobials. FDA insists the list is “not static,” however, and that it will periodically be updated as necessary, taking into consideration such factors as the development of new antimicrobials for human therapy, the emergence of diseases in humans or changes in US prescribing practices.

 

Table 1 Rating an antibiotics importance

Table 1 Poultry antimicrobials and their importance to human medicine, according to FDA.*

Source: Zoetis, based on GFI #152, Appendix A

 

*List of medically important drugs will be reviewed periodically and updated by FDA as needed. (Source: GFI #213)

 

 


tags: , ,
RELATED NEWS
  • So far, so good: Pork producers adjusting well to new VFD rules

    Implementation of the new veterinary feed directive (VFD) in swine has gone smoothly in the field, according to Chris Rademacher, DVM, Iowa State University Extension.

  • New VFD rules affecting disease management for swine

    The updated VFD rules that took effect in January 2017 haven’t required a big adjustment for the swine industry, but they have furthered the trend toward reduced antibiotic use — and the result has been some consequential disease problems, according to Joe Connor,...

  • VFD requirements for feed mills: Not as simple as A, B, C

    Part 4 of an exclusive interview with William Flynn, DVM, MS, deputy director for science and policy for FDA’s Center for Veterinary Medicine, on the new VFD that took effect Jan. 1, 2017.

  • Pork producers will need more than VFD forms to pass an FDA audit

    Complying with the new VFD requires pork producers to do more than establish a veterinary-client-patient relationship and retain printed or digital versions of the VFD forms for a minimum of 2 years.




You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.