fbpx
Sign up now!
Don't show this again

Thank you for confirming your subscription!

(And remember, if ever you want to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, just click on the links at the bottom of any email.)
Tap to download the app
X
Share
X

REPORTS

Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report

Favorites

Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
CREATE
X
NEXT
PORK POULTRY
follow us


You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Pig Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Pig Health Today | Sponsored by Zoetis

.

Improving welfare leads to higher herd performance

Measures to improve animal welfare on hog farms can improve — rather than jeopardize — economic performance of herds, scientists have discovered.

Scientists from Newcastle University and Ghent University found that pig health, welfare and production performance are all linked across farming systems.

And they said the potential to drive productivity and make larger economic gains means that improving animal welfare should become the focus for hog producers.

In study published in the journal Frontiers by PROHEALTH — Europe’s largest-ever project working to combat pig production diseases — researchers collected data on pig performance and assessed levels of biosecurity across 28 breeding and 40 fattening herds on 46 UK farms.

By comparing the information with industry-held data pig health and welfare, they identified several potential links between health, welfare, performance and biosecurity across UK herds.

“The initial correlation analysis showed that the prevalence of lameness and severe tail lesions was associated with the prevalence of enzootic pneumonia-like lesions and pyaemia (blood poisoning),” said lead researcher Fanny Pandolfi of Newcastle University.

“[Also] the prevalence of severe body marks was associated with several disease indicators, including peritonitis and milk spots.

“Higher average daily weight gain was associated with lower prevalence of pleurisy, but no connection was identified between mortality and health indicators.”

Further analysis of the farms suggests those with lower biosecurity scores had higher prevalence of health issues such as peritonitis.

However, while farms with higher biosecurity had higher average daily gains, they did not always see lower levels of mortality, suggesting mortality results from a number of factors.

“The study suggests a smaller impact of biosecurity on issues such as mortality, prevalence of lameness, and pig requiring hospitalization,” Pandolfi added.

“The correlations and the identified clusters suggested the importance of animal welfare for the pig industry.”

Full article

 

 




Posted on September 17, 2018

RELATED NEWS



You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.