Sign up now!
Don't show this again
Download the report!Continue to Site >
or wait 7 secs

Thank you for confirming your subscription!

(And remember, if ever you want to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, just click on the links at the bottom of any email.)

We’re glad you’re enjoying Pig Health Today.
Access is free but you’ll need to register to view more content.
Already registered? Sign In
Tap to download the app


Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report


Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
follow us

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Pig Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Pig Health Today | Sponsored by Zoetis


Fostera® PRRS effective, lasting, safe despite ‘worst case’ challenges

Download the PDF

It’s well known that modified-live porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) vaccines help reduce production losses in breeding herds with PRRS.1 But when the challenge is especially severe, how well and for how long will a PRRS vaccine perform — and is it safe, even if breeding animals naïve for the PRRS virus are accidentally exposed?

“We wanted to find out how Fostera® PRRS performs in the ‘worst case’ scenarios that sometimes confront breeding herds,” said Rick Swalla, DVM, technical services veterinarian, Zoetis. Toward that end, Zoetis designed trials to test the vaccine’s efficacy, its duration of immunity (DOI) and safety when stacked up against severe PRRS virus challenges.

In one of the studies, investigators obtained 70 healthy, cross-bred gilts from a Minnesota producer.2 Half received one dose of Fostera PRRS about 50 days before breeding. At about 85 days of gestation during the third trimester, 39 were challenged with the PRRS virus isolate NADC-20.

“This was a severe challenge because NADC-20 is one of the most virulent PRRS virus strains circulating in North America, and reproductive failure is most likely to occur when infection occurs late in gestation.3 This is the type of scenario pork producers hope to never encounter,” Swalla said.

More viable piglets

Among the control group, there were only nine live pigs born and four viable pigs, which demonstrated the severity of the challenge. In the Fostera PRRS group, there were 155 live pigs born and 134 were viable (Table 1). Put another way, gilts that received Fostera PRRS had 33 times more viable piglets compared to unvaccinated controls (Figure 1), the veterinarian said.

Substantiates 19-week DOI for reproductive disease

The challenge to gilts was administered about 19 weeks after vaccination, so the results substantiate the vaccine’s DOI claim of 19 weeks for PRRS reproductive disease, he said, and noted that the DOI for PRRS respiratory disease is 26 weeks.

Clinical signs after challenge were primarily depression and inappetence, but there were far fewer in vaccinated gilts and they resolved quicker compared to the unvaccinated, challenged group. “In fact, the mean percent of observation days with any clinical sign of PRRS was 46.8% in controls and only 3.5% for the Fostera PRRS group,” Swalla said.

The study results are especially relevant because PRRS still costs producers more than $580 million annually,4 and a substantial portion of the economic damage occurs in breeding herds. Losses are largely due to fewer weaned pigs,5 which obviously requires viable piglets, he said.

Accidental exposure

“Worst case” studies were also conducted to test the safety of Fostera PRRS when accidental exposure occurs. In one of the studies, 76 healthy, PRRS virus-naïve gilts received either a single dose of Fostera PRRS or a sham injection of vaccine diluent at about 90 days of gestation.6

“The investigators didn’t rely on animal-to-animal contact for virus transmission,” Swalla said. “Instead, PRRS virus-naïve gilts were injected intramuscularly to ensure a substantial degree of virus exposure, which was confirmed by checking PRRS virus antibody titers.”

There were no clinical signs of systemic PRRS virus-associated disease among vaccinates, no anorexia or lethargy, and no animals died. Piglets of some vaccinates had dyspnea and were thin, gaunt and rough-haired. In addition, piglet weaning weights and average daily gain during the birth-to-weaning period were reduced, but these findings came as no surprise considering a full dose of vaccine virus was administered to third-trimester PRRS virus-naïve gilts, Swalla said.

“Most notably, the study demonstrated that accidental exposure to Fostera PRRS vaccine virus at 90 days of gestation did not compromise farrowing performance in PRRS virus-naïve gilts,” he said.

In the Fostera PRRS group, there was a higher rate of stillbirths, but no abortions occurred and no differences were observed between groups in the average number of pigs born or pigs born live per litter. Similar results were found when a comparable study was conducted with naïve sows.7

These outcomes were observed even though PRRS virus viremia was detected at birth in 53% of piglets born to gilts, Swalla noted.

Timing of vaccination

Yet another study involving 1,200 gilts and sows showed that Fostera PRRS posed no hazard to the farrowing performance of PRRS virus-naïve gilts regardless of when the vaccine was administered.8 The animals were divided into pre-breeding and first-, second- and third-trimester gestational groups. Within each group, 200 received one, 2-ml intramuscular injection of Fostera PRRS, and 100 served as controls and received saline or sterile water.

All the animals were observed for adverse reactions within 1 hour, at 6 hours and 1 day post-vaccination, and clinical observations were conducted at approximately weekly intervals starting on day 7 until study conclusion on day 21. Injection-site reactions were minimal and similar in all groups. There were very low rates of abnormal post-vaccination reactions such as anorexia and depression, low rates of abnormal clinical signs such as lameness and there were no observations of diarrhea or dyspnea.

Overall farrowing rates were similar in vaccinates and controls, and farrowing rates were similar for all gestational groups (Table 2). Vaccinates and controls generated similar rates of live-born, viable piglets, low-viability piglets, stillborns and mummies, Swalla said.

Important features

Fostera PRRS is labeled for vaccination of healthy, susceptible swine in herds positive for PRRS virus, as an aid in preventing reproductive and respiratory diseases caused by the PRRS virus.

The vaccine has several important features. It protects against a diverse range of PRRS virus field strains.9 It’s also the only commercial PRRS vaccine labeled for administration as early as day 1 of age — which is another testament to its safety, he said.

In contrast to other PRRS vaccines, Fostera PRRS is produced with a unique attenuation method that utilizes a recombinant pig kidney-cell line.10 The vaccine replicates well. Other PRRS vaccines are attenuated using a monkey kidney-cell line, and it can take several generations of viral replication to adapt and grow on pig macrophages — the primary cells that PRRS viruses infect.11

“Producers can have confidence that Fostera PRRS will help mitigate the adverse reproductive effects of PRRS virus nor will it compromise the health of breeders in a variety of circumstances, including ‘worst case’ scenarios,” Swalla said.


1 Vansickle J. How to manage PRRS-negative pigs. National Hog Farmer. 2011 June 16.
2 Data on file. Study Report No. 3127R-60-11-988, Zoetis Inc.
3 Ladinig A, et al. Maternal and fetal predictors of fetal viral load and death in third trimester, type 2 porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infected pregnant gilts. Vet Res. 2015;46:107.
4 Annual PRRS Costs Fall $83.3 Million – Productivity gains blunt the impact of PRRS on the U.S. herd. Pork Checkoff. 2017 June 1.
5 Holtkamp D, Kliebenstein J, Zimmerman J, Neumann E, Rotto H, Yoder T, Wang C, Yeske P, Mowrer C, Haley C. Assessment of the economic impact of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus on U.S. pork producer. National Pork Board Research Report. 2011;NPB #10-158.
6 Data on file. Study Report No. 12ORBIOPORK02, Zoetis Inc.
7 Data on file. Study Report No. 12ORBIOPORK03, Zoetis Inc.
8 Data on file. Study Report No. B921R-US-13-143, Zoetis Inc.
9 Angulo J, et al. Efficacy of a PRRSV MLV vaccine against a genetically diverse range of PRRSV isolates. 2015 Allen D. Leman Swine Conference.
10 Calvert J, et al. Attenuation of a virulent North American porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus isolate on CD163-expressing cell lines, and demonstration of efficacy against a heterologous challenge. 2012 Am Assoc Swine Vet annual meeting.
11 Renukaradhya GJ, et al. Live porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus vaccines: Current status and future direction. Vaccine. 2015;33:4069-4080.



All trademarks are the property of Zoetis Services LLC or a related company or a licensor unless otherwise noted.


Discoveries is a series of research news reports written by the editors of Pig Health Today on behalf of the US Pork Business of Zoetis.

July 2021




Share It
It’s well known that modified-live PRRS vaccines help reduce production losses in breeding herds with PRRS. But when the challenge is especially severe, how well and for how long will a PRRS vaccine perform?

Click an icon to share this information with your industry contacts.

Posted on July 14, 2021

tags: , ,

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Share It
A recent study shows it’s feasible to obtain data on antimicrobial use while keeping information confidential, said Peter Davies, PhD, principal investigator and professor in the College of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Minnesota.

Click an icon to share this information with your industry contacts.
Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.