Sign up now!
Don't show this again

Thank you for confirming your subscription!

(And remember, if ever you want to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, just click on the links at the bottom of any email.)
Tap to download the app
X
Share
X

REPORTS

Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report

Favorites

Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
CREATE
X
NEXT
PORK POULTRY
follow us


You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Pig Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Pig Health Today | Sponsored by Zoetis

.

Data can help improve PRRS control

Download our special report

This is one of eight reports that appears in a special edition
of Pig Health Today, “Framing the Future of PRRS.”
For a free copy, click here.

 

Implementing metrics and utilizing predictive analytics can help pork producers improve their management of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS), said Jose Angulo, DVM, a PRRS specialist for Zoetis.

“There are many lessons learned and fewer wasted efforts when decisions are made based on data generated from an affected production system,” he said. “Producers can apply a systematic approach and make better decisions, in contrast to making reactive decisions when PRRS strikes.”

Angulo defined a metric as a mathematical function that identifies a gap between the current state and a goal.

To apply metrics, he advised using statistical process control (SPC) charts — graphs used to study how process variation changes over time — to track performance data. SPC charts come in a variety of forms and are already used in the pork industry. They’re a good way to plot and compare past and current pig performance and monitor the progress of PRRS-control programs. The charts can be especially helpful for identifying variation, which he called the enemy of swine production.

SELECT KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

To start the process, a few important key performance indicators should be identified. These might include weekly data on abortion rates, live-borns or piglet mortality rates as well as total pigs weaned. Historical information for each indicator is charted and provides baseline data to compare with new information that’s collected after PRRS-control plans are initiated, Angulo said, noting that the charts can also be used to generate metrics, such as the average time between PRRS outbreaks or time to baseline production, among others.

Zoetis has tested the value of this process in the field, he continued. One of the projects involved 9,000 sows on four breed-to-wean Iowa farms1 where different strategies for PRRS control, including a killed PRRS vaccine, had been unsuccessfully used in the past.

The primary immunological tool of the new plan was use of a modified-live PRRS vaccine administered quarterly to the entire breeding herd and administration of two doses to replacement gilts, Angulo said. The goals were to develop a PRRS virus-control strategy to maintain breeding-herd stability, mitigate any potential wild-type PRRS virus (WT-PRRSv) re-circulation and/or new WT-PRRSv introduction and to establish standardized processes for measuring success in applied PRRS-control interventions.

Several key performance indicators were used to measure success and were compared to the previous 18 months of production data using SPC charts. Capability analysis — a set of calculations for statistical analysis — was also used.

The results demonstrated performance problems before the new PRRS-control plan was initiated and an improvement in performance and a reduction in variability after the plan was implemented (Figure 1). Breeding-herd stability was achieved on all four sow farms, evidenced by negative PRRS virus results on polymerase chain reaction testing of suckling pigs, he said.

Angulo showed SPC charts from the project (Figure 2), which he said demonstrated the value of applying a systematic approach to PRRS control in breeding herds.

Using a systematic approach to monitor and evaluate decisions also provides a building block for predictive analytics, Angulo said.

Predictive analytics is defined as a technology that learns from experience (data) to predict the future behavior of individuals in order to drive better decisions. The power of predictive analytics is already evident in other industries. In fact, most major retailers have a predictive-analytics department enabling them to improve their marketing.

In swine production systems, predictive analytics can be used to drive decisions about implementation of interventions that may minimize or even prevent disease outbreaks, he said.

 

1 Holtkamp DJ, et al. Terminology for classifying swine herds by PRRS virus status. J Swine Health Prod. 2011;19(1):44-56.

 

 


tags: , ,
RELATED NEWS



You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.