Tap to download the app
X
Share
X

REPORTS

Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report

Favorites

Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
CREATE
X
NEXT
PORK POULTRY
follow us


You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Pig Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Pig Health Today | Sponsored by Zoetis

.

Print

Currently available vaccines important tools for managing PEDV-infected sow herds

Currently available vaccines can be important tools for managing sow herds endemically infected with porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), indicates a study presented at the 2017 annual meeting of the American Association of Swine Veterinarians.1

Monitoring and maintaining levels of immunity sufficient to protect neonatal pigs is needed because there’s little possibility PEDV will be eradicated anytime soon, said Jordan Kraft, a veterinary student at Iowa State University.

Kraft and colleagues conducted a study to compare gilt responses to vaccination using two commercially available PEDV vaccines. Gilt immune response was measured by immunoglobulin levels, specifically IgA and IGg, and neutralizing antibody levels in serum, colostrum and milk samples.

PEDV antibody-positive commercial gilts were randomly assigned to one of five groups. One group received the commercial “Vaccine A” at 2 weeks pre-farrowing, and another group received the vaccine at 5 and 2 weeks pre-farrowing. The other commercial PEDV vaccine, “Vaccine B,” was also administered at 2 weeks pre-farrowing or at 5 and 2 weeks pre-farrowing. The fifth group received no vaccine and served as a control.

The investigators found that in gilts with prior exposure to PEDV, vaccination significantly (p < 0.05) increased IgG, IgA and neutralizing antibody levels based on samples of serum, colostrum and milk taken after farrowing. Gilts that received Vaccine B, a conditionally licensed Zoetis product, had higher IgG levels in serum and colostrum compared to the results with Vaccine A, Kraft reported.

Gilt serum antibody levels taken at 5 weeks pre-farrowing — before vaccination and measured as IgG and IgA by the fluorescent focus neutralization assay — were similar among the groups, which provides evidence that the differences found were due to vaccination, Kraft said.

 

 

 

1 Kraft J, et al. Serum and mammary secretion antibody responses in PEDV-exposed gilts following PEDV vaccination. In: Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Swine Veterinarians (February 25-28, 2017). Page 50.

 

 

 

 


tags: , ,
RELATED NEWS
  • PEDV still taking major toll on US sow farms

    Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) is still around and can lead to major losses for pork producers, cautioned Gene Nemechek, DVM, technical services veterinarian, Zoetis.

  • PEDV and other pathogens survive in feed for weeks

    In 2013-2014, infection of pig farms with PEDV was a frequent event, even in farms using the highest level of biosecurity. In an effort to determine how this could happen, Scott Dee, DVM, began investigating.

  • Feed biosecurity must address risk of PEDV transmission

    The biosecurity of swine feed is important for producing healthy animals and safe pork. But until 2013, feed was considered a low-risk vehicle for transmitting viral pathogens to swine.

  • What PED taught us about handling future disease outbreaks

    The porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) outbreak that devastated many US hog farms over the past 4 years served as a wake-up call for the pork industry to be more vigilant against foreign animal diseases.




You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.