Sign up now!
Don't show this again

Thank you for confirming your subscription!

(And remember, if ever you want to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, just click on the links at the bottom of any email.)
Tap to download the app
X
Share
X

REPORTS

Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report

Favorites

Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
CREATE
X
NEXT
PORK POULTRY
follow us


You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Pig Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Pig Health Today | Sponsored by Zoetis

.

Commonly used disinfectants can vary widely in efficacy

Commonly used disinfectants can have substantially different efficacy and should be tested against the pathogen of concern — and under the conditions of use — before they’re used on swine farms, caution investigators from the University of Minnesota, St. Paul.1

In their study, they tested three disinfectants commonly used on Minnesota swine farms against Senecavirus A (SVA) — household bleach, a phenolic disinfectant and a quaternary ammonium-aldehyde disinfectant.

The disinfectants were tested on five different surfaces — aluminum, stainless steel, rubber, cement and plastic — at two different temperatures. The SVA used was a contemporary strain, said Azad Singh, MVSc, and colleagues in the 2017 March and April issue of the Journal of Swine Health and Production.

Common bleach was most effective, they reported. At about 25° C (77° F), bleach at a 1:20 dilution inactivated ≥ 99.99% of the virus within 10 to 15 minutes on aluminum, rubber and plastic.

On stainless steel and cured cement, it inactivated 99.97% and 99.98% of the virus, respectively. At 4° C (39.2° F), bleach inactivated ≥ 99.99% of the virus within 5 to 15 minutes on all surfaces except rubber, where it inactivated 99.91% after 15 minutes, they report.

In contrast, the phenolic disinfectant used at the manufacturer’s recommended concentration inactivated ≤ 82.41% of the virus at either temperature and on any surface, even after a 60-minute contact time.

Results for the quaternary ammonium disinfectant were intermediate: It inactivated 78.12% to 99.81% of the virus within 60 minutes at both temperatures and on all surfaces, they say.

The investigators pointed out their experiments were performed without added organic matter, such as manure, which is inevitable on swine farms and reduces disinfectant efficacy. As a result, “the cleaning of the facilities before the application of disinfectants is a prerequisite,” they said.

The investigators noted that because they used only dry surfaces in their study, they couldn’t determine whether results would be the same on the wet surfaces common in swine barns.

Even though 4° C (39.2° F) doesn’t represent conditions inside a swine barn, it does reflect outside conditions, especially during Midwestern winters, they added.

 

[1] Singh A, et al. Efficacy of three disinfectants against Senecavirus A on five surfaces and at two temperatures. J Swine Health Prod. 2017;25(2):64-68.


tags: ,
RELATED NEWS



You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.