Sign up now!
Don't show this again
Download the report!Continue to Site >
or wait 7 secs

Thank you for confirming your subscription!

(And remember, if ever you want to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, just click on the links at the bottom of any email.)

We’re glad you’re enjoying Pig Health Today.
Access is free but you’ll need to register to view more content.
Already registered? Sign In
Tap to download the app


Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report


Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
follow us

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Pig Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Pig Health Today | Sponsored by Zoetis

Colostrum aids as PCV2 diagnosis

Colostrum may be best sample for PCV2 on sow farms

Colostrum may be the best sample to test for determining whether porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) is present in sow herds, according to researchers at Iowa State University (ISU).1

In a study involving 78 sows from three unvaccinated sow farms, investigators tested sow colostrum, sow serum, piglet serum and placental umbilical cord serum (PUCS) to see which was the best to use for detecting PCV2 DNA by polymerase chain reaction.

Within 4 hours of farrowing, they also obtained serum and PUCS samples from piglets of the sows tested on each farm. Piglet serum and PUCS samples were pooled by sow, explained Rachel Schulte, an ISU student, at the 2017 American Association of Swine Veterinarians annual meeting.

Nearly 13% of colostrum samples were positive compared to only 6% of sow serum samples, 10% of PUCS samples and 0% of piglet serum samples. In every case where PUCS samples were positive, the sow colostrum or serum tested negative, she reported.

“The absence of positive piglet serum samples may indicate that this sampling method is an unreliable means of detection or that none of the piglets were viremic,” Schulte said, based on the study, conducted jointly with the Fairmont Veterinary Clinic, Minnesota, and sponsored by Zoetis.





1. Schulte R, et al. Sample comparison for detecting porcine circovirus type 2 in breeding herds. . In: Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Swine Veterinarians (February 25-28, 2017). Page 72.




Posted on June 20, 2017

tags: ,
  • Johnson: Five steps for porcine circovirus control

    Some breed-to-wean farms that have been vaccinated for porcine circovirus (PCV) have experienced breakdowns in their control of the virus. Clayton Johnson, DVM, outlines his top five steps for managing PCV outbreaks.

  • Processing fluids provide an option to monitor PCV2 and PCVAD

    Effective PCV2 control relies on vaccination of healthy pigs before they become infected. This goal cannot be accomplished in unstable herds whose sows give birth to viremic pigs.

  • Comparing PCV2 gilt vaccination protocols and progeny status

    Porcine circovirus type 2 is the principal etiological agent of porcine circovirus associated disease (PCVAD), which can cost producers an estimated $3 to $4 per pig.

  • It’s back: Clinical outbreak of PCV2 in genetic herds reported

    A clinical outbreak of porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) occurred this past winter in otherwise healthy, well-vaccinated herds, Clayton Johnson, DVM, of Carthage Veterinary Service, told Pig Health Today.

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.