Sign up now!
Don't show this again

Thank you for confirming your subscription!

(And remember, if ever you want to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, just click on the links at the bottom of any email.)
Tap to download the app
X
Share
X

REPORTS

Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report

Favorites

Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
CREATE
X
NEXT
PORK POULTRY
follow us


You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Pig Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Pig Health Today | Sponsored by Zoetis

.

Calls to cut antibiotics could hurt pig health, vet warns

Calls to ban antibiotics for disease protection in pig and other livestock systems could damage animal welfare and compromise the United States’ food system, industry leaders say.

The National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) said World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations that farmers should to stop using antibiotics routinely to prevent disease go against producers’ obligations to care for their animals.

Liz Wagstrom, NPPC chief veterinarian, said US pig producers share the WHO’s concerns about the rise in antibiotic-resistant bacteria and understand the need to use antibiotics responsibly.

But she said that producers are already devoting time and resources to reduce antibiotics use, and further restrictions would be ill-advised.

“Denying pigs, cows and chickens necessary antibiotics would be unethical and immoral, leading to animal suffering and possibly death,” she said.

“Using antibiotics to prevent disease, in most cases, supplants the need to use more potent medically important antibiotics to treat disease.”

The WHO’s new global recommendations, published in November 2017, aim to preserve the effectiveness of antibiotics that are important for human medicine by reducing their unnecessary use in animals.

In some countries, about 80% of medically important antibiotics are used in the animal sector, largely for growth promotion in healthy animals.

The organization also wants countries to ban disease prevention use of antibiotics without diagnosis.

But Wagstrom said US pig producers already work with veterinarians to comply with rules prohibiting the use of antibiotics important to human medicine.

Simply reducing on-farm use of antibiotics will have little effect on public health and would jeopardize animal health, she added.

“The US pork industry’s goal is to reduce the need for antibiotics, and it has devoted time and resources to that end, including adopting good antibiotic stewardship practices and studying alternatives to antibiotics.

“[The WHO’s] call for stopping the use of antibiotics that are critically important in human medicine for treating infected animals is antithetical to pork farmers’ and veterinarians’ moral obligation to care for their pigs.”

 

 


tags: , ,
RELATED NEWS



You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.