Sign up now!
Don't show this again
Download the report!Continue to Site >
or wait 7 secs

Thank you for confirming your subscription!

(And remember, if ever you want to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, just click on the links at the bottom of any email.)

We’re glad you’re enjoying Pig Health Today.
Access is free but you’ll need to register to view more content.
Already registered? Sign In
Tap to download the app


Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report


Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
follow us

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Pig Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Pig Health Today | Sponsored by Zoetis


Breeding sows without CD163 gene might ultimately eliminate PRRS virus

Sows without the CD163 gene are not only resistant to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus, they also give birth to healthy, normal piglets — a finding that could ultimately lead to elimination of a devastating disease, researchers say. 

In their study, the researchers demonstrated that the absence of CD163 in the sow is sufficient to protect the fetus from PRRS. Piglets from these sows may still be susceptible to the disease later in life, but they will respond better to PRRS virus vaccines, researchers from the University of Missouri and Kansas State University (KSU) said in NatureScientific Reports online in October 2017.1 

CD163 as a receptor for the PRRS virus was first described in 2007. Previous studies by this same group of researchers showed that pigs with a complete knockout of the CD163 gene are free of PRRS virus infection. 

The current study involved seven gilts with the CD163 knockout, which were bred with CD163-positive boars to produce CD163-free fetuses. The gilts were then challenged with PRRS virus strain NVSL 97-7895, reported Raymond “Bob” Rowland, PhD, of KSU, who led the research and presented findings at the 2017 North American PRRS Symposium. 

Polymerase chain reaction data demonstrated that in sows with the CD163 gene, there’s a wide variation of virus concentration among fetuses, and they become infected at different times, Rowland said.   

The reproductive form of the PRRS virus infection causes abortions, dead fetuses and respiratory disease in newborns. It can lead to 90% mortality of fetuses and neonates, along with increased sow mortality. Fetuses that survive the infection become continuous sources of the virus, resulting in endemically infected herds, he said.  

Pork producers could save millions of dollars if pigs are protected from PRRS virus during the reproductive process, Rowland said at the symposium.  




1 Rowland, RRR et al. Knockout of maternal CD163 protects fetuses from infection with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV). Nature, Scientific Reports 7, Article number: 13371(2017). doi:10.1038/s41598-017-13794-2. 

Posted on April 12, 2018

tags: , ,

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Share It
US producers and veterinarians have seen an influx of different types of influenza viruses in the last 10 to 15 years, and that is a major reason why influenza is more difficult to control.

Click an icon to share this information with your industry contacts.
Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.