Sign up now!
Don't show this again
Download the report!Continue to Site >
or wait 7 secs

Thank you for confirming your subscription!

(And remember, if ever you want to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, just click on the links at the bottom of any email.)

We’re glad you’re enjoying Pig Health Today.
Access is free but you’ll need to register to view more content.
Already registered? Sign In
Tap to download the app


Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report


Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
follow us

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Pig Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Pig Health Today | Sponsored by Zoetis


Bigger not always better in quest for sustainable pork

Striving to produce heavier pigs is not necessarily the answer to increasing pig productivity and farm profitability, an expert in pig genetics has warned.

Grant Walling, director of UK pig genetics company JSR Genetics, said bigger animals from larger litter sizes was not a straightforward way to make pig production more sustainable, and could result in products that consumers don’t want to eat.

Speaking at the European Federation of Animal Science conference in Belfast, Ireland, Dr. Walling said farmers were under pressure to increase their output in a bid to be profitable and meet growing demand for pork.

But attempting to tackle the problem by producing heavier animals from larger litters would make pig farms more complicated to manage and potentially less profitable, he said.

“Elite sows currently produce 3.13 tons of carcasses a year,” he told delegates during a session on the biological and commercial likelihoods of producing a five-ton sow.

“Increasing litter size traditionally led to increased productivity, but we know now that mortality increases in larger litters. We also know that larger litters mean lighter pigs, which are less likely to reach their full value.”

Considerable work for minimal gain

Dr. Walling said breeders could focus on traits that shorten the production cycle, such as reduced gestation, but warned it would be a considerable amount of work for minimal gain.

To have the most significant impact on production, farmers could raise larger pigs, but that might not necessarily lead to greater profits, he said.

“Consumer demand for pork is based on weight. There’s a reason why we see conformed sizes of pork chops in our supermarkets, and if we increase chop size then we would fail to meet retail demand.”

Aiming to produce a larger sow would also lead to a reduction of efficiencies on-farm, with growth curves slowing as pigs get bigger, he added.

“The average farm needs 130 days accommodation post-slaughter to get to 110 kg (243 lbs) live-weight. If we say tomorrow we have to get up to a 130 kg (287 lbs) carcass we need 206 days of accommodation, or we need to grow 462 g (0.5 lbs) per day faster — a 58% increase on today’s rate.

“The challenge of achieving that equates to 39 years of genetic progress. It’s clearly not something we can implement straight away.”

However, while producing a 5-ton sow was commercially and biologically unlikely, Dr. Walling said making on-farm improvements to achieve 3.5-ton sows was ‘very achievable’.

“The emphasis going forward has to be on piglets,” he said. “We shouldn’t simply be striving for more piglets and then dealing with them afterwards. We need as many animals born to reach their full weight and be reared in a way that consumers find acceptable.”

Posted on September 26, 2016

tags: , , ,

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.