Sign up now!
Don't show this again

Thank you for confirming your subscription!

(And remember, if ever you want to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, just click on the links at the bottom of any email.)
Tap to download the app


Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report


Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
follow us

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Pig Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Pig Health Today | Sponsored by Zoetis


Antibiotic use at weaning can reduce acute illness in pigs

The transition into the nursery phase for just-weaned pigs presents many challenges as they adapt to a new diet, a new environment and increased competition. Combine these stressors with exposure to bacterial pathogens such as Streptococcus suis and Haemophilus parasuis, and young pigs often need some extra help.

“Industry practice is to control respiratory disease in young, growing pigs with an antibiotic treatment at weaning,” said Joel Steckelberg, Iowa State University veterinary student. “I wanted to compare the effectiveness of two antibiotics, ceftiofur and enrofloxacin, on early wean-finish pig health.”

His study involved a 3,100-head sow farm that weaned pigs negative for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) but with a high incidence of S. suis-related pneumonia and post-weaning septicemia.1

Pigs from 325 litters were weaned, on average, at 24.5 days of age, weighing 13.4 pounds, and were placed into pens of 54 pigs. The pens were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: ceftiofur (Ce), 1,275 pigs; enrofloxacin (En), 1,289 pigs; and negative control (NC), 1,280 pigs.

Steckelberg collected oral-fluid samples when pigs were enrolled in the study and again at its conclusion (5 weeks after the last pigs were enrolled). Two mortality spikes occurred and were investigated diagnostically.

A contract grower, blinded to the treatment groups, recorded mortalities, treatments and pulls into hospital pens. Individual pig care (IPC) scores were applied on days 2, 7, 11, 21 and 35 post-weaning. This was done to determine the percentage of acute (A), subacute (B) and chronic (C) pigs for each treatment group (Table 1).

To provide perspective of the pigs’ health profile, Steckelberg noted the following:

  • Oral fluids collected at placement were negative for PRRS and influenza-A virus of swine (IAV-S).
  • Tissue results from the first mortality spike showed all treatment groups had suis septicemia and were negative for PRRS and IAV-S.
  • Oral fluids tested for the second mortality spike were positive for IAV-S.
  • Oral fluids collected at the study’s conclusion were negative for IAV-S, and eight out of 12 samples were PRRSV-positive after vaccination (Fostera PRRS) 1 week prior.

The mortality percentage, as well as pigs in the hospital pens, were not statistically different among the three treatment groups, as shown in Table 1, Steckelberg noted.

In this flow, antibiotic treatments at weaning had no significant effect on early wean-finish mortality and recorded mixed results on morbidity when previously healthy pigs faced S. suis challenges.

“Groups that received antibiotics at weaning did have a significant reduction in acutely sick pigs,” he added, “thereby showing some health improvement during the early wean-finish phase.”




1 Steckelberg J, et al. Evaluation of antibiotics at weaning on swine respiratory disease in early wean-finish phase. Student Seminar, 49th American Association of Swine Veterinarians’ Annual Meeting. 2018;73-74.

Posted on July 9, 2018

tags: , , ,
  • Streptococcus suis leads SHIC’s Swine Bacterial Disease Matrix list

    Viruses tend to get first priority when it comes to monitoring swine diseases and herd health, but bacteria can wreak just as much havoc.

  • Tails or testicles: Which are better for PRRSV monitoring?

    Pooled serum samples are a common method to monitor PPRSV in piglets. But this typically involves a limited number of samples, which reduces the sensitivity and makes detection especially challenging in low-prevalence herds.

  • Strep suis resurfacing to challenge high-health herds

    What’s old is new again — or at least that’s what some high-health herds are finding with Streptococcus suis (Strep suis).

  • Non-thermal plasma reactors can inactivate PRRSV

    Hog-farm biosecurity measures have largely focused on minimizing the transmission of infectious agents on various surfaces. However, it’s been shown that PRRSV — and possibly other respiratory diseases — can be transmitted via air.

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.